Characterization of Coronary Flow Reserve and Left Ventricular Remodeling in a Mouse Model of Chronic Aortic Regurgitation With Carvedilol Intervention
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that left ventricular (LV) remodeling might be exaggerated by an impaired coronary flow reserve in mice with chronic severe aortic regurgitation, and carvedilol, a β-adrenoceptor blocker, could regress the course. METHODS: Severe aortic regurgitation was induced by retrograde puncture of the aortic valve leaflets under sonographic guidance in 12-week-old male C57BL/6J mice. Four weeks after regurgitation, the mice were treated with carvedilol (30 mg/kg/d) or not treated (control). Before and 4 weeks after carvedilol treatment, the coronary flow reserve and LV structure and function were evaluated by echocardiography. Cardiomyocytes and fibrosis were validated by histologic analysis. RESULTS: Four-week aortic regurgitation caused a decreased LV ejection fraction and an increased LV end-systolic volume index. Regurgitation also impaired the coronary flow reserve due to an increase in the basal coronary peak diastolic velocity and velocity-time integral combined with the absence of substantial changes in the hyperemic coronary peak diastolic velocity and velocity-time integral. Four more weeks of regurgitation further deteriorated LV remodeling and coronary perfusion in the control group. In contrast, the carvedilol-treated group showed attenuated LV remodeling and a higher coronary flow reserve by decreasing the basal peak diastolic velocity and velocity-time integral without substantial changes in the hyperemic peak diastolic velocity and velocity-time integral. The coronary flow reserve and its pretreatment versus posttreatment difference were positively correlated with the pretreatment versus posttreatment LV ejection fraction and end-systolic volume index differences. In the carvedilol-treated group, subendocardial fibrosis was significantly reduced (P < .05), and the cardiomyocyte cross-sectional area tended to be smaller. CONCLUSIONS: In mice with chronic severe aortic regurgitation, carvedilol therapy significantly improves the impaired coronary flow reserve and sufficiently attenuates adverse LV remodeling. Sustained coronary flow reserve impairment indicates progressive LV remodeling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".