MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974285180 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.39.2.341

HIGH-TEMPERATURE STABILITY OF LAURITE AND Ru Os Ir ALLOY AND THEIR ROLE IN PGE FRACTIONATION IN MAFIC MAGMAS

2001· article· en· W1974285180 on OpenAlexaffvenue
James M. Brenan, D R Andrews

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaficGeochemistryGeologyFractionationAlloyChemistryMetallurgyMaterials scienceChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a result of an error in the JANAF tables in the free energy of formation (Gf) of the gas species S2O, H2S2 and HS (V. Kress, pers. commun., 2001), calcu-lated values of oxygen and sulfur fugacities, f(O2) and f(S2), respectively, presented in Table 1 of Brenan & Andrews (2001; hereafter BA) are incorrect. A revised version of the program COHSmix was kindly supplied by Victor Kress, and new values of f(O2) and f(S2) have been calculated, and provided in Table 1 of this erra-tum (note also that there was a misprint in the rates of gas flow for experiment Ru7, and the correct values are provided). Inasmuch as the error is related to the calcu-lation of the proportions of S-bearing gas species, we have checked the accuracy of calculated f(S2) using the pyrrhotite sulfur barometer of Toulmin & Barton (1964)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations283
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207