MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974310242 · doi:10.2202/1542-6580.1281

A Study of Fermentation for Human Interleukin-11 with Recombinant <i>E. Coli</i>

2005· article· en· W1974310242 on OpenAlexafffund
Kaili Zhao, Yiru Gan, Zisheng Jason Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Food and Drug Administration
KeywordsFermentationBioprocessIndustrial fermentationRecombinant DNAGlycerolCarbon sourceChemistryLaboratory flaskFood scienceBiochemistryBiologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recombinant human interleukin-11(rhIL-11) is still the only therapy drug for thrombocytopenia. Although the biological properties and clinical behaviors of rhIL-11 have been studied extensively, its bioprocess development data have rarely been reported. In this work, fermentation conditions for recombinant E. coli, which expressed interleukin-11 as a fusion protein, were investigated. Batch and fed-batch fermentation experiments were performed in shake flasks and in a BioFlo fermenter with different medium and carbon sources under different operational parameters. Based on the results of the study, M9Ca medium was shown as the better medium and glycerol was identified to be a better carbon source than glucose for the expression of rhIL-11. When glycerol was used as the carbon source in fed-batch fermentation, a dry cell weight of 9.2 g/L and a rhIL-11 expression of 22%, were achieved. The results could be used as references in the optimization of the fermentation process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Chemical Reactor EngineeringSame topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchFrench-language works237,207