Impact of Microgel Morphology on Functionalized Microgel−Drug Interactions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The interactions of a range of water-soluble drugs of different charges and hydrophobicities with carboxylic acid-functionalized poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-based microgels containing different functional group distributions are investigated to determine the impact of drug properties and microgel morphologies on drug uptake and release. The radial distribution of carboxylic acid functional groups in the microgel and the hydrophobicities of the cationic drugs both strongly affect drug partitioning between the solution and microgel phases. Microgels with surface-localized functional group distributions bind less cationic drug than bulk-functionalized microgels, likely due to the formation of a locally collapsed "skin layer" at the acid-base drug binding sites at the microgel surface. In this way, cationic drugs induce a local phase transition that can be used to regulate small molecule diffusion in and out of the gel. As the drug hydrophobicity is increased, the skin layer becomes more condensed and less drug uptake is achieved. In the case of anionic or neutral drugs, high drug uptakes are achieved independent of the functional group distribution within the microgel. High drug uptake is also observed when nonfunctionalized poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) microgels are used as the uptake matrix, suggesting the importance of hydrophobic partitioning in regulating drug-microgel interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it