MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974316628 · doi:10.1115/ipc2002-27213

Target Reliability Levels for Onshore Gas Pipelines

2002· article· en· W1974316628 on OpenAlexaff
Tom Zimmerman, Maher Nessim, Martin McLamb, Brian Rothwell, Joe Zhou, Alan Glover

Bibliographic record

Venue4th International Pipeline Conference, Parts A and B · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Canadian institutionsTransCanada (Canada)
FundersBP GlobalBP Exploration Operating Company Limited
KeywordsPipeline transportReliability (semiconductor)Pipeline (software)Reliability engineeringReliability theoryEngineeringComputer scienceFailure rateMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Establishing target reliability levels that have wide industry and regulatory acceptance is necessary in order to proceed with the implementation of reliability-based design techniques for pipelines. The target reliability levels described in this paper are based on life safety considerations and are applicable to natural gas pipelines. They were calibrated to a series of pipeline designs based on ASME B31.8, using design parameters and operating practices intended to be representative of North American pipelines. The targets define an upper bound to the total failure rate due to failure events involving significant leaks (excluding pinholes) and ruptures. This paper summarizes the results of the analyses undertaken to establish the target reliability levels, provides the target reliability curves developed and presents an approximate analysis of their economic implications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.728
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue4th International Pipeline Conference, Parts A and BSame topicStructural Integrity and Reliability AnalysisFrench-language works237,207