MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974382995 · doi:10.7202/1019109ar

La Politique d’intervention en matière de violence conjugale, dix-huit ans plus tard

2013· article· fr· W1974382995 on OpenAlex
Rémi Boivin, Frédéric Ouellet

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueService social · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntimate Partner and Family Violence
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalInternational Centre for Comparative Criminology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePoison controlPhilosophyMedicineMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Politique d’intervention en matière de violence conjugale adoptée par le gouvernement du Québec en 1986 et renouvelée en 1995 a eu des effets considérables sur la société québécoise. En plus de constituer une prise de position formelle réclamée pendant plusieurs années par différents mouvements féministes, la Politique a profondément modifié les pratiques policières d’enregistrement des infractions de violence entre conjoints. L’analyse présentée dans cet article démontre que la Politique a fait augmenter le nombre de dossiers à traiter par le système judiciaire et que les données policières offrent aujourd’hui un portrait plus réaliste du phénomène de la violence conjugale au Québec. Ces résultats suggèrent que la Politique a atteint, du moins en partie, ses objectifs de dépistage et de sensibilisation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.493
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it