← Back to cohort
Learning in the CHREST Cognitive Architecture
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Bibliographic record
VenueSpringerReference · 2012
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Education and Schools
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoUniversity of California, IrvineLingnan UniversityStockholms UniversitetUniversidade do MinhoNational Taiwan Normal UniversitySyddansk UniversitetUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreUniversity of HaifaCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversiti Putra MalaysiaOrta Doğu Teknik ÜniversitesiVrije Universiteit AmsterdamLomonosov Moscow State UniversityRadboud UniversiteitHarvard Graduate School of EducationUniversity of AucklandInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleGriffith UniversityCenter for Advanced Study, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignKU LeuvenPomona CollegeUniversity of New South WalesAnadolu ÜniversitesiMonash UniversityUniversity College CorkMassey UniversityAustralian Catholic UniversityCardiff UniversityUniversity of SussexUniversity of California, Los AngelesUniversità degli Studi di MilanoSaint Louis UniversityManchester Metropolitan UniversityUniversity College LondonUniversity of SouthamptonMax Planck Instituut voor PsycholinguïstiekKent State UniversityWellcome TrustUniversity of OxfordMcMaster UniversityNorges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige UniversitetIndiana University BloomingtonUniversidade Estadual de CampinasUniversity of BernCarnegie Mellon UniversityRobert Gordon UniversityiMindsImperial College LondonUniversity of MemphisUniversity of OklahomaYork UniversityQueen's UniversityUniversity of MiamiUniversity of Central FloridaNorthwestern UniversityUniversity of MissouriUniversiteit UtrechtTU Graz, Internationale Beziehungen und MobilitätsprogrammeUniversité de LyonUniversity of Technology SydneyIllinois State UniversityUniversity of ConnecticutMcGill UniversityUniversität SalzburgUniversität des SaarlandesUniversiteit GentWorcester Polytechnic InstituteBrown UniversityQueensland Brain InstituteUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill UniversityUtah State UniversityPrinceton UniversityUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUniversity of GeorgiaPennsylvania State UniversityWestern Michigan UniversityHarvard UniversityUniversity of Pennsylvania
KeywordsArchitectureCognitive architectureCognitionComputer scienceComputer architectureCognitive sciencePsychologyNeuroscienceGeographyArchaeology
Abstract
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itQuick stats
Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractno