MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sofrimento no trabalho e imaginário organizacional: ideação suicida de trabalhadora bancária

2011· article· pt· W1974486236 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsicologia & Sociedade · 2011
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Work Dynamics
Canadian institutionsCascades (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyPsychologyHumanitiesBusinessPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este trabalho examina as relações entre o imaginário organizacional difundido pelas empresas e o sofrimento no trabalho no contexto das reestruturações produtivas, por meio de estudo de caso no setor bancário. Analisa-se o suporte de dominação psíquica da organização sobre o indivíduo, por meio da difusão massificada dos valores da empresa como os valores sociais, cuja gestão do afetivo se soma à gestão pelo medo. Entrevistou-se administradora lotada em um banco privado, afastada para tratamento mental por conta de ideação suicida iminente, após 30 anos de trabalho na empresa. Os dados foram analisados por meio de análise categorial. Os resultados evidenciaram que a entrevistada assimilou fortemente o discurso do banco, ao longo dos anos, de modo que a sua vida passou a gravitar em torno dos objetivos da empresa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it