MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974516855 · doi:10.1139/p10-009

Rate coefficients for electron impact excitation, de-excitation and laser gain calculations of the excited ions Co(XVII) up to Br(XXV)

2010· article· en· W1974516855 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Waleed Othman Younis, S. H. Allam, Th.M. El-Sherbini

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcited statePhysicsAtomic physicsExcitationIonIonizationElectron ionizationElectronElectron excitationRate equationPopulationPrincipal quantum numberIonization energyQuantumQuantum mechanicsKinetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rate coefficients for electron impact excitation, de-excitation, and total depopulation of the excited ions Co(XVII) up to Br(XXV) of the sodium isoelectronic sequence are calculated according to the analytical formulas of Vriens and Smeets. A simple modification has been made by substituting effective quantum numbers in Vriens' formulas to be applicable for the ions under consideration. The energy levels and transition probabilities have been calculated using Hibbert's configuration interaction computer package (CIV3). Level population densities are then calculated by solving the coupled rate equations involving the 19 levels 1s 2 2s 2 2p 6 nl, where n = 3,4,5 and l = 0,1,2,3. Positive gain coefficients are displayed for the transitions 4p( 2 P 1/2 ) → 4s( 2 S 1/2 ) and 4p( 2 P 3/2 ) → 4s( 2 S 1/2 ) at three selected electron temperatures, namel, 1/4, 1/2, and 3/4 the ionization potential of each ion, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207