Astro- and cosmochemical consequences of accretion bursts – I. The D/H ratio of water
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The D/H ratio of water in protostellar systems is a result of both inheritance from the parent molecular cloud and isotopic exchange in the disc. A possibly widespread feature of disc evolution, ignored in previous studies, is accretion bursts (or FU Orionis outbursts), which may thermally process a large fraction of the water. One proposed underlying mechanism for FU Orionis outbursts relies on the presence of a magnetically dead zone. Here we examine the evolution of (D/H)water in 1D simulations of a disc's evolution that includes dead zones and infall from an envelope with given D/H ratio in the infalling water (∼10−3), and compare the results with similar calculations without dead zones. We find that the accretion bursts result in a significantly lower (D/H)water ratio and a more extended region (radius up to ∼1–3 au) where water is equilibrated with hydrogen gas (D/H = 2 × 10−5), when compared to burst-free models. Solar system constraints suggest that our solar nebula either experienced no accretion bursts and had a Schmidt number ≲ 0.2 or had a Schmidt number closer to ‘nominal’ values (∼1) and experienced several accretion bursts. Finally, future observations of (D/H)water in protoplanetary discs will allow inferences about angular momentum properties of the disc during disc building and the role of accretion bursts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".