Leveraging parasport events for community participation: development of a theoretical framework
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractResearch question: Sporting events have become highly sought after tools for economic, tourism, and social development in cities around the world; however, little is understood about how to effectively leverage events. This purpose of this paper is to present a framework for leveraging small-medium scale sporting events for increasing community accessibility and opportunities for persons with a disability to participate in sport, recreation, and leisure.Research methods: Drawing upon interview and documentary data that are part of a broader research project that examines how small-medium scale sporting events have and can be leveraged to enhance accessible opportunities in local communities, the data were reanalysed focused postevent learning in regards to leveraging strategies for future event opportunities in order to build the framework.Results and findings: The Parasport-leveraging Framework is presented here as an emergent leveraging structure that shifts the focus of parasport event legacies away from the notion that merely hosting a disability sport event will impact upon communities' understanding and relationship with disability sport. Further, the framework emphasizes the need to strategically use the events in the context of policy frames and discourses of event-related processes.Implications: This research furthers the work of Chalip, Smith, and others who have argued that in order for benefits to accrue to a host region, host communities need to find points of leverage within the context of event resources to enhance positive social legacies. Additionally, it offers a strategic starting point for communities seeking to implement leveraging plans alongside event agendas.Keywords: leverageparasporteventscommunity developmentaccessibility Notes1. The Ontario Trillium Foundation ([OTF], Citation2013) supports local communities through grants to build healthy and vibrant communities throughout Ontario and to strengthen the capacity of the voluntary sector through investments in community-based initiatives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it