MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974542320 · doi:10.1137/140959638

Stability and Sensitivity Analysis of the iSIR Model for Indirectly Transmitted Infectious Diseases with Immunological Threshold

2014· article· en· W1974542320 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCOVID-19 epidemiological studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSteady state (chemistry)OutbreakInvariant (physics)BiologyMathematicsVirologyChemistryMathematical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most pathogenic diseases remain epidemic and endemic in the world, causing thousands of deaths annually in less developed countries. Yet, their dynamics are still not fully understood. In this paper, we carry out a thorough stability and sensitivity analysis of an iSIR which incorporates an infection term that explicitly includes a minimum infection dose (MID), and determine an invariant domain. We discover that if the MID (denoted c) is less than the bacterial carrying capacity K, we may have two steady states: the endemic or epidemic steady state, and the disease-free and bacteria-free steady state. The latter is unstable and the former is globally stable under a certain condition. On the other hand, if $c\geq K$, then up to four steady states may exist: an unstable endemic steady state, a locally stable endemic steady state, a conditionally globally stable disease-free steady state, and an unstable disease-free and bacteria-free steady state. We find that to control the period and intensity of the outbreaks, it might be better to focus on the bacterial carrying capacity rather than on the shedding rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.311
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it