Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ostow ’s review essay addresses two recent books by the scholars Ruth Mandel and Joyce Marie Mushaben that deal with Turkish migration and partial integration in Germany. She outlines how the lenses of these authors’ respective disciplines—political science and cultural anthropology—shape their different but potentially complementary understanding of Turkish guest-workers and their families and descendants, and how the analysis of the politics and culture surrounding their arrival and eventual settlement in Germany must be situated in the context of the larger waves of flight, resettlement, and labor recruitment that have brought 20 million newcomers who have stayed on in Germany since the end of World War II. She argues that Germany became a country housing diasporas while lacking a properly nuanced set of admission, citizenship, and cultural absorption policies. She praises and details the advantages both of Mushaben’s approach, which compares the experience of quite diverse immigrants (Italian, Polish, and German in addition to Turkish), and Mandel’s, which deals with smaller histories and interfaces—“spaces of interaction”—where German and Turkish and sometimes other cultures meet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".