The Future of Islamic Banking in Sultanate of Oman
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study aims to identify the future of Islamic Banking in Sultanate of Oman. Islamic Banks adhere to the concepts of (Sharia’ah) Islamic law. The basic source of shariah principles are the Holy Quran which are followed by the consensus of the jurisits and interpreters of Islamic law. The shariah prohibits dealing with interest (Riba) in any shape or form which is the most essential feature of Islamic Banking. The study identified the phenomena related to future of Islamic Banking, Customer’s attitudes of Islamic Banking and the effect of Islamic Banking on economy of Oman. Descriptive research design was adopted and proportionate stratified random sampling was chosen for study. The strata were mutually exclusive. Questionnaires on the future of Islamic Banking in sultanate of Oman were distributed among customers and economist in Muscat, Sultanate of Oman. Eighty questionnaires were received from the respondents (customers) and twenty four questionnaires were received from the Economist. Data were refined, tabulated and analyzed. Result indicated that the respondents showed a positive attitude towards dealing with Islamic banking and it supports the national economy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".