MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974557099 · doi:10.1142/s0129156408005461

SPECTRAL PROCESSING OF LASER-INDUCED FLUORESCENCE FROM THREATENING BIOLOGICAL AEROSOLS

2008· article· en· W1974557099 on OpenAlex
Pierre Lahaie, Jean-Robert Simard, John E. McFee, Sylvie Buteau, Jim Ho, Pierre Mathieu, G. Roy, Vincent Larochelle

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of High Speed Electronics and Systems · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSIGNAL (programming language)Remote sensingDetectorFluorescenceLidarLaser-induced fluorescenceComputer scienceDetection theoryReal-time computingOpticsPhysicsTelecommunicationsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The stand-off detection classification by laser induced fluorescence is the objective of the Biosense project. The sensor will perform the monitoring of a defined area around its location using an elastic lidar detector for particles cloud. The detection of cloud will trigger fluorescence probing of the cloud. To perform this task the area fluorescence background will be monitored in order to evaluate if a return signal changed. Using a simple signal model built with experimental data, we designed a detection and monitoring procedure for the fluorescence at a single location. Signal simulations have been performed to verify the operation of the system. The results of the simulation indicate the system is able to detect anomaly with small contrast between a signal and the background. The results will have to be extended to area surveillance and a more complete signal model for various environments in natural conditions is required

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it