Abundance and Demography of Channel Catfish in a Large Northern River
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A northern population of channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus was assessed to ascertain the abundance and demographics of the population. Standardized trap-netting was conducted from 1997 to 2002 in six reaches of the Ottawa River. A total of 13,197 channel catfish were sampled. The relative stock density was 18.5% stock, 47.7% quality, 27.2% preferred, 4.4% memorable, and 0.5% trophy. Mean relative weight was 71 for all channel catfish combined and for the different size-classes it was 37 for stock, 61 for quality, 88 for preferred, 133 for memorable, and 120 for trophy. Growth was slow compared with that of more southerly populations but longevity was greater (ages of up to 26 years). Annual mortality was 15.7%. Population estimates ranged from 38,445 to 220,924 in the various reaches, and density ranged from 3.5 to 31.7/ha. Channel catfish are an abundant and underutilized species in the Ottawa River; however, given their life history traits, this fishery is susceptible to overexploitation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".