MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974602517 · doi:10.1139/o05-151

TXM13 human melanoma cells: a novel source for the inhibition kinetics of human tyrosinase and for screening whitening agents

2006· article· en· W1974602517 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yong‐Doo Park, Soyeon Kim, You‐Jeong Lyou, Dong‐Youn Lee, Jun‐Mo Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicmelanin and skin pigmentation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChongqing University of Arts and Sciences
KeywordsTyrosinaseDepigmentationMelanomaMelanocyteMelaninCell cultureSkin whiteningChemistryHuman cellCancer researchPharmacologyBiologyBiochemistryEnzymeIn vitroGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research involving whitening agents requires several steps of experimentation, and the initial step is to test whitening agents with human melanocytes and those with human tyrosinase. Unfortunately, it takes a long time to gather human melanocytes, and these cells have some limitations when it comes to performing experiments, such as their passage difficulties and their cost. In this study, we suggest that the TXM13 human melanoma cells could be a useful cell candidate for studying human tyrosinase inhibition and depigmentation. We applied a tyrosinase inhibitor, such as dithioglycerine (DTGC), to validate the cell line's usefulness, and we tested the effect of DTGC on TXM13 melanogenesis. The results showed that human tyrosinase from TXM13 was appropriate, according to the inhibition kinetics, and that the conspicuous depigmentation of TXM13 occurred after DTGC treatment without downregulating the tyrosinase expression level. When taken together, our findings provide useful information regarding the use of the TXM13 melanoma cells for the development of whitening agents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicmelanin and skin pigmentationFrench-language works237,207