<sup>103</sup>Tc nuclear structure and systematic evolution of states of g<sub>9/2</sub> parentage in odd-<i>A</i> <sup>95, 97, 99, 101, 103</sup>Tc isotopes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A systematic study of the evolution of the nuclear structure (at low and medium energies) of odd-A 95–103Tc isotopes is presented. These changes are indeed affected predominantly by changes in deformation and subsequently the position of the Fermi level. Hence a complete study of previously observed positive and negative parity states (at low and medium energies) of 103Tc in the framework of the particle–rotor model is performed. Experimental energies and transition properties will be compared to those predicted by the model calculations. The systematic model calculations show that those rotational “multiplets” emerging as a result of the larger Coriolis mixing, especially among positive-parity Nilsson states of g9/2 parentage in less deformed isotopes 95, 97, 99, 101Tc, are just as natural a prediction of the model as rotational bands built on states of good Ω in well deformed 103Tc (strong coupling) as confirmed experimentally.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".