MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974637153 · doi:10.1504/ijex.2014.062923

Thermodynamic analysis of an integrated gasification combined cycle power plant: effect of nitrogen supply on system performance

2014· article· en· W1974637153 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmet Ozbilen, İbrahim Dinçer, Marc A. Rosen

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Exergy · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExergyExergy efficiencyOverall pressure ratioEnvironmental scienceCombined cycleIntegrated gasification combined cyclePower stationRankine cycleProcess engineeringNitrogenCombustionCoal gasificationCombustion chamberSteam turbineNuclear engineeringElectricity generationCoalTurbineThermodynamicsPower (physics)Waste managementChemistryEngineeringGas compressorPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A comprehensive thermodynamic analysis of a conceptual integrated coal gasification combined cycle power plant is presented. Energy and exergy efficiencies and exergy destructions of each sub-unit are calculated. The effect of nitrogen, which is supplied from the Air Separation Unit (ASU) of the gasification unit to the combustion chamber of the gas turbine (GT) cycle, on system performance is parametrically studied. The energy efficiency of the system is found to be 41%, while the exergy efficiency for the integrated gasification combined cycle power plant is 37%. The results also demonstrate that the nitrogen supply enhances the system performance. Additional parametric studies are presented for various operating conditions: nitrogen supply ratio, pressure ratio, and steam turbine inlet temperatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of ExergySame topicThermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling SystemsFrench-language works237,207