MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974643540 · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/50/3/009

Estimation of a method detection limit for an<i>in vivo</i>XRF arsenic detection system

2005· article· en· W1974643540 on OpenAlexaff
Ryan Studinski, Fiona E. McNeill, David R. Chettle, J. M. O’Meara

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics in Medicine and Biology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicArsenic contamination and mitigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArsenicDetection limitMonte Carlo methodLimit (mathematics)In vivoMaterials scienceBiological systemChemistryChromatographyMathematicsStatisticsBiologyMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An x-ray fluorescence measurement system has been developed with an 125I source to detect arsenic in superficial layers of phantoms and tissue. Based on in vivo measurements, in conjunction with Monte Carlo simulations, the detection limit for arsenic in skin ranges between 2.6+/-0.5 and 5.7+/-1.1 microg g(-1), depending on skin thickness and assuming that arsenic is uniformly distributed in the skin. The effect of skin arsenic distribution was also examined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics in Medicine and BiologySame topicArsenic contamination and mitigationFrench-language works237,207