Towards vulnerability-based intrusion detection with event processing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Computer systems continue to be breached despite substantial investments in defense mechanisms to stop attacks from propagating. The accuracy of current intrusion detection systems (IDSes) is hindered by the limited capability of regular expressions (REs) to express the exact vulnerability. Recent advances have proposed vulnerability-based IDSes that parse traffic and retrieve protocol semantics to describe the vulnerability. Such a description of attacks is analogous to subscriptions that specify events of interest in event processing systems. However, the matching engine of state-of-the-art IDSes lacks efficient matching algorithms that can process many signatures simultaneously. In this work, we place event processing in the core of the IDS and propose novel algorithms to efficiently match vulnerability signatures. Also, we are among the first to detect complex attacks such as the Conficker worm which requires correlating multiple protocol data units (MPDUs) while maintaining a small memory footprint. Finally, we show that our algorithms are resilient to attacks through extensive testing of the IDS under different workloads. Our approach incurs negligible overhead when processing clean traffic and is faster than existing systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".