MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1974725764 · doi:10.1177/1715163514522763

New year, new challenges

2014· article· fr· W1974725764 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Ross T. Tsuyuki

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Well, it’s another year and our new practitioners continue to be confronted with changes and challenges. Bryan Gray continues to work in the Ridgeway Clinic (described previously) but has also been working in another small-format Shoppers Drug Mart (SDM) at the Fort William Clinic and at a full-sized SDM. He describes quite a contrast between the 3 settings. The Fort William clinic is an interesting scenario. The physicians are moving to a new location across town (where they’ll be served by an independent pharmacy), so the pharmacy at Fort William has become very quiet. This has, however, allowed Bryan to meet some of the clinic staff with whom he has been interacting via phone and fax. One nurse asked, “Are you the same Bryan who works at Ridgeway?” The 2 physicians and the nurse then all said, “Oohhh, you’re the pharmacist who’s been sending us all the faxes from Ridgeway!” They laughed and told him to keep up the good work. Bryan feels it’s nice to get that kind of recognition. In reflecting back on his first 6 months in practice, Bryan describes now having a sense of “permanence” or “continuousness.” As he puts it, “I’m now working at my career and profession . . . which is lifelong. I am now a pharmacist.” He describes a sense of belonging and says of his patients, “I am becoming part of their life—becoming their pharmacist.” He also admits to being naive about pharmacists’ expanded scope of practice. He recognizes that the change is complex: imposed quotas and targets, integrating clinical services with dispensary duties, interacting with physicians and getting the rest of the pharmacy team to accept these changes are all challenges. Nevertheless, his plans for 2014 are to persevere. Meanwhile, Reid McDonald and Anita Cumbleton have left Barrhead and moved to Calgary. They realize that in order to practise the way they want, they will have to own their own pharmacy. In the meantime, Anita has taken a position at a large chain store. She is finding the practice environment very different—she feels she is regarded as only a “prescription checker” and someone to deal with insurance issues and complaints. Not surprisingly, she doesn’t feel she is having the same impact on patient’s health and well-being. Reid is working at 2 independent pharmacies, helping them over the holiday season. Reid and Anita have ambitious plans to open their own pharmacy in March. At this point, they are awaiting approval of their plans from the Alberta College of Pharmacists. This will be a small 1000-ft2 pharmacy with a minimal front store and 2 examination/counselling rooms, located in Cochrane, Alberta (about 35 minutes west of Calgary, population 18,750). In reflecting on his first 6 months in the “real world,” Reid feels that “there is so much that we can do, but unfortunately, few pharmacists want to invest in that future.” He feels a certain frustration with other pharmacists not embracing the expanded scope of practice. He feels that they are just “too comfortable and/or lazy—they would rather be told what to do by management.” Anita has seen firsthand that the corporate hierarchy also seems to be a barrier to the uptake of pharmacists’ scope of practice. Those of you following along could probably have predicted some of these events. Finally, a large dose of reality, you might say. It certainly does appear that many different forces are conspiring to prevent pharmacists from providing patient-centred care. But as I’ve said before, what is inspiring about these young pharmacists is how they handle these challenges—with resilience and keeping their eye on the goal. ■

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.251
Threshold uncertainty score0.840

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.006
Scholarly communication0.0200.024
Open science0.0030.015
Research integrity0.0090.021
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2510.109

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada→Same topicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes→French-language works237,207→