MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974733725 · doi:10.1109/vetecs.2010.5493962

Effects of Side Information on Complexity Reduction in Superimposed Pilot Channel Estimation in OFDM Systems

2010· article· en· W1974733725 on OpenAlexaff
Sahar Javaher Haghighi, Serguei Primak, Xianbin Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingChannel (broadcasting)SubcarrierFadingComputer scienceInterference (communication)AlgorithmPrecodingReduction (mathematics)Channel state informationSpectral efficiencyDoppler effectStatisticsTelecommunicationsMathematicsWirelessMIMO

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel, reduced complexity iterative channel estimation algorithm for OFDM systems using superimposed pilots is proposed. It utilizes past channel estimations of double correlated channel as a side information to reduce number of iterations. Since pilots are available at all positions of the time-frequency OFDM grid in superimposed technique, the performance of the channel estimation does not degrade because of the variations of the fast fading channel between two pilots. On the other hand since no subcarrier is reserved for channel estimation purpose, superimposed pilot technique leads to improved spectral efficiency comparing to in-band OFDM pilots. However interference from data carrying signals made channel estimation more complex. In this paper, Least Square (LS) channel estimation followed by two dimensional Wiener filter for reducing OFDM symbol interference is done iteratively to achieve the Minimum Mean Square Error (MMSE). Small variations of the channel over each OFDM symbol duration are neglected due to a high data rate, but the values between different OFDM symbols are assumed correlated. The channel is modeled as a double selective, i.e. both frequency selectivity channel and Doppler shift are taken into consideration. Past channel estimates are used as side information for the present channel estimation to improve the forthcoming channel estimation at the first iteration and reduce the total number of iterations required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207