Cérémonies de mariage dans la vallée du Haut-Richelieu au XXe siècle : le faste et le sacré
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Une enquête menée dans la région de Saint-Jean-Iberville, auprès de personnes mariées au cours des périodes 1920-1940 et 1980-1995, a permis de montrer la transformation de la cérémonie religieuse du mariage au XXe siècle. Ce changement est le résultat de multiples tensions. D’abord, l’Église édicte les règles de la célébration des mariages et établit une classification des cérémonies en fonction de l’aisance des familles. Ensuite, les prêtres tentent de répondre aux demandes des fidèles qui réclament des rites renforçant la distinction sociale. Enfin, un groupe au sein du clergé s’oppose au déploiement cérémoniel lors des mariages. À la fin du siècle, les cérémonies de mariage sont fastueuses et les couples tiennent une place très importante dans leur organisation. Si l’Église favorise la participation des époux et de leurs familles, elle n’a pas totalement perdu son privilège de définir le rituel religieux. Elle est parvenue à transmettre aux jeunes mariés sa vision sacrée du mariage et de la famille.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".