L'échelle d'autoefficacité des enseignants: validation canadienne-française du Teacher efficacy scale
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s'inscrit dans la foulée des recherches sur le sentiment d'autoefficacité des enseignants. Il rapporte deux études visant à traduire en langue française et à valider le Teacher efficacy scale (Gibson et Dembo, 1984), l'instrument le plus utilisé concernant ce concept. La méthode s'inspire de celle de Vallerand (1989). Dans une première étude, la stabilité temporelle et la consistance interne de l'instrument sont estimées: des analyses factorielles de type exploratoire sont réalisées sur des données provenant d'un échantillon de futurs enseignants. Dans une seconde étude, des analyses factorielles confirmatoires ont été faites sur des données issues d'un échantillon d'enseignants en exercice. Les résultats présentent une image probante des qualités psychométriques de la version française du Teacher efficacy scale .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it