Systemic Arterial Pressure at Maturity in Rats Following Chronic Hypoxia in Early Life
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The effect of prolonged hypoxemia in early life on systemic arterial blood pressure at maturity was assessed in Sprague-Dawley rats. METHODS: Animals hypoxic in early life (12 males, 10 females) were raised in hypoxia (FiO₂ = 0.12) for the first 10 days of life and subsequently raised in normoxia, along with age-matched controls (11 males, 9 females). At 2 months of age, arterial blood pressure was recorded intravascularly using telemetry in awake and unrestrained animals over two 12-h night-time (active) and daytime (resting) periods. Aortic pulse wave velocity was assessed in six additional hypoxic pretreated and five control anesthetized 2-month-old male rats. RESULTS: Systolic, mean, and pulse pressures were significantly greater in the hypoxic pretreated group compared to the control group during resting and active periods in both sexes (P ≤ 0.05). Diastolic pressure and heart rate did not differ between the two groups. Hypoxic pretreated males displayed significantly increased blood pressure variability during the resting period. Aortic pulse wave velocity was also found to be elevated in the hypoxic pretreated rats. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged hypoxic stress in early life in the rat is associated with increased systolic arterial pressure at maturity very likely due to decreased arterial compliance. These findings suggest that a nutrient-independent, postnatal stress may lead to long-lasting vascular alterations predisposing to increased arterial pressure at maturity. This raises the possibility that adult survivors of congenital cyanotic cardiac disease may be at risk for secondary cardiovascular morbidity unrelated to surgical repair or residual cardiac defects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".