MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974793039 · doi:10.1080/11926422.2005.9673387

Canada and migrant sex‐work: Challenging the ‘foreign’ in foreign policy

2005· article· en· W1974793039 on OpenAlexaffabout
Leslie Ann Jeffrey

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Foreign Policy Journal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFraming (construction)ImmigrationForeign policyPolitical scienceExternalizationGovernment (linguistics)Sex workImmigration policyWork (physics)Gender studiesPolitical economySociologyPoliticsLawGeographyPsychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article discusses the Canadian response to “trafficking in women” or migrant sex work as part of the construction of Canada's national identity as a “missionary” nation. By framing traffic in women as a foreign and immigration policy issue, the Canadian government allows for the externalization of the problem so that Canada retains its self‐identification as a good, helpful nation – even as Canadian sex‐trade and migration policies themselves constitute a large part of the problem. The article discusses the problems faced by migrant sex workers, the policy responses of the Canadian government, and the implications of those policy responses framed as rescue, rather than rights.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0430.024
Scholarly communication0.0130.003
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0070.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Foreign Policy JournalSame topicSex work and related issuesFrench-language works237,207