Bibliographic record
Abstract
At the beginning of the twentieth century, the Scotsman J. M. Barrie created Peter Pan, a character so successful he was subject to interpretation since his early existence: Barrie himself first conceived him as a baby in his novel The Little White Bird to later transform him into the hero of both a play and a children’s novel. After the death of his original author – and in the context of literary and film adaptations– the character maintains the eagerness for eternal youth and a state of permanent crisis. But he adopts a series of new traits: he becomes, amongst other things, a dreamed child, the ideal of juvenile love, a Dickensian orphan, a young murderer, a vampire, a family man, a lunatic, a punk… Within his new existences, Peter will grow up to be a youngster, an adult and an old man and will experiment the four crucial crises of psychosocial development as articulated by Erik Erikson: the Oedipal crisis, fantasy versus reality, the teenager identity crisis, and the adult ones (Erikson, 1974). Despite the sweet image portrayed by Disney that remains in the unconscious collective, Peter Pan –in adaptation– emerges as a hero in permanent crisis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".