MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974820515 · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2013-303748

Hypertension and cardiovascular disease endpoints by ethnic group: the promise of data linkage

2013· editorial· en· W1974820515 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Charles Agyemang, Raj Bhopal

Bibliographic record

VenueHeart · 2013
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEthnic groupLinkage (software)Internal medicineDiseaseCardiologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypertension is the most important risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD), accounting for approximately 45% of global CVD morbidity and mortality.1 Evidence suggests striking differences in blood pressure (BP) and hypertension prevalence between ethnic groups. West African descent adults living in Europe and North America, whether they come directly from Africa or indirectly from the Caribbean, generally have higher BP levels and a higher prevalence of hypertension than European descent populations (henceforth, white individuals), with this being seen at all ages in North America and only from adulthood in the UK.2 ,3 Chinese-origin people also have slightly higher BP and prevalence of hypertension than white individuals.4 ,5 The evidence is mixed when it comes to the South-Asian descent populations (ie, Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi and Sri Lankan people). In a systematic review in the UK, BP levels among South-Asian individuals were generally similar to that of the UK general population, but there were stark differences among the South-Asian subgroups, with slightly higher BP in Indian individuals, slightly lower BP in Pakistani individuals, and much lower BP in Bangladeshi individuals.6 Studies in The Netherlands7 and Canada,5 ,8 however, show a higher hypertension prevalence in South-Asian than in white individuals. In the Ontario Health Survey, the age-standardised hypertension prevalence among South-Asian individuals was 30.1% compared with 20.7% among white Canadian people.8 South-Asian were still more likely than white Canadian individuals to have hypertension even after adjustment for age, sex and body mass index. While hypertension remains the most important risk factor for CVD, its contribution to the ethnic differences in CVD outcomes is still sometimes puzzling. In the UK, although the BP levels are similar or lower in the South-Asian relative to the general population, they have a higher mortality from stroke and …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.296
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.578
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.296
Threshold uncertainty score0.868

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2960.578
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.006
Bibliometrics0.0130.023
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0110.016
Open science0.0060.015
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeartSame topicHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionFrench-language works237,207