MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974836522 · doi:10.1021/la0110794

Refined Method of Assessment of Parameters of Micellization of Surfactants and Percolation of W/O Microemulsions

2002· article· en· W1974836522 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLangmuir · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
Topicthermodynamics and calorimetric analyses
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroemulsionChemistryEnthalpyDilutionPercolation (cognitive psychology)ThermodynamicsIsothermal processMicellar solutionsPulmonary surfactantAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyMicellePhysical chemistryPhysicsAqueous solution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The course of the differential heats of dilution of a surfactant measured in an isothermal titration microcalorimeter is normally of sigmoidal type. The course of percolation of conductance of a water in oil microemulsion induced by either temperature or the water content of the system is also of sigmoidal nature. Derivation of the critical micellar concentration and the enthalpy of micellization (Δ H m ) in the former has been demonstrated to be conveniently obtained by employing the Sigmoidal-Boltzmann equation (SBE). The SBE has been shown also to be conveniently applicable for accurate determination of the threshold temperature (θ p ) and volume fraction (φ p ) of percolation in the latter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it