MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974855298 · doi:10.1139/b05-104

Diurnal cycle of sparteine production in Lupinus arcticus

2005· article· en· W1974855298 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Gregory J. Sharam, Roy Turkington

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotanical Research and Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaArctic Institute of North America
KeywordsSparteineLupinusBiologyHerbivoreBotanyAnimal scienceChemistryStereochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sparteine is a neurological toxin found in arctic lupine ( Lupinus arcticus S. Wats.) and is probably used as a defensive chemical to deter herbivory, particularly by snowshoe hares ( Lepus americanus Erxleben). Lupine leaves were collected in southwestern Yukon at 2 h intervals for 2 consecutive days at the peak of the growing season (24–25 June), and their sparteine was extracted and compared with a standard using gas chromatography. A significant daily cycle of sparteine in leaf material was observed, with maximum concentrations occurring during the night and minimum during the afternoon. This may be a temporally optimal response to higher levels of hare herbivory that occur at night.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2005
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BotanySame topicBotanical Research and ChemistryFrench-language works237,207