MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974861471 · doi:10.1007/s13676-012-0005-x

Districting for routing with stochastic customers

2012· article· en· W1974861471 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
FundersNational University of Defense TechnologyNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsHeuristicMathematical optimizationRouting (electronic design automation)Vehicle routing problemComputer scienceCompact spaceOperations researchMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce the vehicle routing and districting problem with stochastic customers (VRDPSC). This problem is modelled and solved as a two-stage stochastic program during which the districting decisions are made in the first stage and the Beardwood–Halton–Hammersley formula is used to approximate the expected routing cost of each district in the second stage. District compactness is also considered as part of the objective function. We have developed a large neighbourhood search heuristic for VRDPSC. The heuristic was tested on modified Solomon instances and on modified Gehring and Homberger instances. Extensive computational results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed heuristic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it