MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974885065 · doi:10.1109/mpul.2011.940392

The Dream Factory

2011· article· en· W1974885065 on OpenAlexaff
Nadya Anscombe

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Pulse · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Science and Diplomacy
Canadian institutionsWorld Federation of Science Journalists
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEuropean unionFactory (object-oriented programming)BureaucracyPrincipal (computer security)DreamProcess (computing)EngineeringPublic administrationBusinessPolitical scienceComputer scienceLawInternational tradeComputer securityPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Applying for research funding in the European Union (EU) can be a lengthy, arduous process littered with bureaucratic hurdles and paperwork. Under the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7), the projects need to involve partners from several different European countries, and there is a lot of paperwork for the principal investigator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.026
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.294

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0260.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.008
Scholarly communication0.0210.018
Open science0.0040.019
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0880.060

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE PulseSame topicInternational Science and DiplomacyFrench-language works237,207