MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1974894012 · doi:10.1242/jeb.023853

HOT FISH NEED BOXER BRIEFS

2009· article· en· W1974894012 on OpenAlexaff
Erika J. Eliason

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApoptosisReproductionBiologyFish <Actinopterygii>Germ cellDegeneration (medical)ZoologyBass (fish)SpermAndrologyPhysiologyEcologyFisheryMedicineGeneticsPathologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is well known that elevated testicular temperature can lead to low sperm count and other reproductive problems in male mammals. Just ask any father who switched from briefs to boxers when trying to have a baby. It turns out that some fish, such as pejerrey and Florida largemouth bass, also experience heat-induced gonadal damage, except that both males and females are affected. And as fish are unable to regulate their body temperature, increasing global temperatures could have a damaging effect on reproduction and worldwide fish populations.While the mechanism is poorly understood in fish, in mammals, gonadal degeneration generally occurs through a process called apoptosis. Apoptosis is essentially when a cell commits suicide through a number of characteristic steps. Lauro Satoru Ito from the Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology and colleagues from Brazil and Japan sought to determine whether apoptosis occurs during warm water-induced gonadal degeneration in male and female pejerrey, whose natural habitat in the shallow lagoons of South America can reach 31–32°C.To characterize gonadal degeneration and germ cell loss and examine the occurrence of apoptosis, the authors exposed fish to a prolonged heat stress(16 weeks at 29°C) or a short heat stress (36 h at 31°C and then returned to 24°C), or held them at a comfortable 24°C. Then the team sampled the fishes' gonads at various time points (hours, days, weeks) to look for histochemical and biochemical signs of gonadal degeneration, germ cell loss and apoptosis.The team found clear evidence of apoptosis in the gonadal cells of both male and female pejerrey. Remarkably, all of the fish exposed to a prolonged heat stress survived and only 11% of those exposed to a short heat stress died. Furthermore, all the fish fed normally except for fish during the short 31°C exposure. Thus, this experiment demonstrates that warm temperatures,which may have no effect on survival or even feeding, can nonetheless have negative effects on reproduction.Not surprisingly, the severity of the gonadal damage was proportional to the magnitude of the heat stress. In addition, males were more susceptible to heat stress than females. Interestingly, Ito and his team observed substantial individual variability in heat sensitivity. For example, some male pejerrey exposed to prolonged heat stress were completely devoid of sperm-producing germ cells at the end of the study while other fish from the same treatment group appeared completely normal. However, the basis of this variability is unknown.This study provides valuable information in the field of thermal reproductive biology, which is imperative in the face of global warming and its potentially catastrophic consequences for fish populations. The work performed by Ito and colleagues shows that warm temperatures can harm the gonads of pejerrey in a similar manner to mammals. In addition, pejerrey require a lower range of temperatures to successfully reproduce than they do to simply survive. This means that if these fish want to have babies, they need to keep cool. If only fish could wear boxer briefs!

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0800.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental Biology→Same topicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations→French-language works237,207→