MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974931722 · doi:10.1021/jp075460u

Bond Orbitals from Chemical Valence Theory

2008· article· en· W1974931722 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModern valence bond theoryValence bond theoryOrbital hybridisationMolecular orbital theoryGeneralized valence bondChemical bondValence (chemistry)ChemistryLinear combination of atomic orbitalsSTO-nG basis setsBasis setPhysicsMolecular orbitalComputational chemistryQuantum mechanicsDensity functional theoryMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two sets of orbitals are derived, directly connected to the Nalewajski-Mrozek valence and bond-multiplicity indices: Localized Orbitals from the Bond-Multiplicity Operator (LOBO) and the Natural Orbitals for Chemical Valence (NOCV). LOBO are defined as the eigenvectors of the bond-multiplicity operator. The expectation value of this operator is the corresponding bond index. Thus, the approach presented here allows for a discussion of localized orbitals and bond multiplicity within one common framework of chemical valence theory. Another set of orbitals discussed in the present work, NOCV, are defined as eigenvectors of the overall chemical valence operator. This set of orbitals can be especially useful for a description of bonding in transition metal complexes, as it allows for separation of the deformation density contributions originating from the ligand --> metal donation and metal --> ligand back-donation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it