MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974952049 · doi:10.3382/japr.2011-00486

Use of live vaccines for coccidiosis control in replacement layer pullets

2012· article· en· W1974952049 on OpenAlexaffabout
K.R. Price

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Applied Poultry Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCoccidia and coccidiosis research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoccidiosisEimeriaFlockPoultry farmingVaccinationBiologyVeterinary medicineVirologyMedicineMicrobiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coccidiosis, caused by host-specific parasites in the genus Eimeria, is a common disease in the poultry industry that produces high economic losses stemming from decreased flock performance and coccidiosis control systems. Prophylactic anticoccidials remain the prevention method of choice in the poultry industry, although drug-resistant Eimeria species and concern over drug residues in poultry products have made vaccines increasingly desirable. Many types of coccidiosis vaccines have been introduced, yet live vaccinations, either with nonattenuated or attenuated oocysts, have been commonly used in commercial poultry houses. Live Eimeria vaccination stimulates protective immunity, resulting from the first small dose of vaccinal oocysts and enhanced through cycling parasites fecal-orally. The cycling of the controlled infection with live vaccination is influenced by commercial housing techniques, especially with replacement layer pullet tiered-cage systems. This review provides an overview of coccidiosis caused by Eimeria species infecting domestic fowl and the nature of coccidial infections in commercial poultry houses, with particular attention to replacement layer hen rearing production systems in Canada and the United States.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.152
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Applied Poultry ResearchSame topicCoccidia and coccidiosis researchFrench-language works237,207