MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975029088 · doi:10.4133/jeeg7.4.169

Investigation of Hazardous Waste Sites and their Environment Using the BGR Helicopter-Borne Geophysical System

2002· article· en· W1975029088 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
B. Siemon, Christiane Stuntebeck, Klaus‐Peter Sengpiel, B. Röttger, H. J. Rehli, Detlef Eberle

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnexploded ordnanceGeologyRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceMining engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources of Germany (BGR) completed a research and development project aiming at optimizing its helicopter-borne geophysical system for high resolution site characterization. The overall objective was to adapt the existing helicopter-borne geophysical system used for groundwater and mineral exploration to survey conditions where the anomalies to be recorded are much smaller. The BGR helicopter-borne system permits simultaneous electromagnetic (AEM), magnetic (AMAG), and gamma-ray surveying. At the suggestion of the BGR, the AEM system manufactured by Geoterrex-Dighem, Toronto, Canada, was improved compared with the Dighem III system formerly used. The new system operates at five frequencies and the transmitter and receiver dipole moments are increased up to 25%. In addition, the system is now calibrated during flight. The sensitivity to waste objects was augmented by reducing the sensor heights from more than 30m (AEM) and 45m (AMAG), respectively, to less than 20m about ground level by means of installing a magnetic sensor and a laser altimeter in the AEM bird. Enhanced spatial resolution was achieved by decreasing the sampling distance along line from about 10mto3m and by reducing the line separation from about a hundred meters to less than 50m due to better navigational and positioning instruments. The modified system was tested over two former military training areas south of Berlin, Germany. Special surveys to locate steel drums, scrap metal, steel pipes, petrol tanks, ordnance, buried at depths from 0.3to1.5m were carried out with nominal bird heights of 20m and flight-line spacings of 50m. Due to the extremely weak AEM and magnetic anomalies produced by these materials, suitable detection algorithms were developed to recognize and to identify these weak anomalies. They were tested using an airborne data set collected over an area where thousands of anomalies had been found. Many of them were subsequently verified on the ground. More than 90% of the anomalies selected for verification could be confirmed either by visual inspection of the ground surface or ground geophysical surveying or excavation. The modified AEM system not only allows better detection of waste but also better investigation of the environment. The AEM data could be reliably inverted to resistivity vs. depth sections using multi-layer inversion procedures. These resistivity data provide information about the hydrogeology and lithology, e.g., the depth of the groundwater table or the distribution of clay and silt. Thus, AEM can be successfully used for the hydrogeological and geological mapping of the near surface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.160
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental and Engineering GeophysicsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207