MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975039828 · doi:10.1002/zamm.201200087

<b>N</b>‐Phase decagonal quasicrystalline circular inclusions under thermomechanical loadings

2012· article· en· W1975039828 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueZAMM ‐ Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuasicrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaShanghai Municipal Education Commission
KeywordsThermoelastic dampingInterphaseMaterials scienceMatrix (chemical analysis)IsotropyStress fieldPhase (matter)Field (mathematics)Composite materialStress (linguistics)GeometryMathematicsPhysicsFinite element methodOpticsThermalThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this work a simple and effective method is proposed to solve the problem corresponding to plane strain deformations of an N ‐phase decagonal quasicrystalline circular inclusion‐matrix system in which the circular inclusion is bonded to the surrounding matrix through ( N ‐2) co‐axial interphase layers. We consider three kinds of thermomechanical loadings: (i) the matrix is subjected to a remote uniform stress field; (ii) the composite undergoes a uniform temperature change; (iii) the matrix is subjected to a uniform heat flux at infinity. We find that it is sufficient to manipulate three 8 × 8 real matrices, a 5 × 5 real matrix, and another 4 × 4 real matrix to arrive at the complete temperature and thermoelastic fields within the circular inclusion and the surrounding matrix, irrespective of the number of interphase layers existing within the composite system. Our results clearly indicate that the existence of the intermediate interphase layer(s) mean that the internal stresses within the circular inclusion are: (i) sextic functions of the two coordinates x 1 and x 2 under the loading of a remote uniform stress field; (ii) quadratic functions of the two coordinates under the loading of a uniform temperature change; (iii) cubic functions of the two coordinates under the loading of a remote uniform heat flux. The design of neutral and harmonic coated circular inclusions is also discussed as an application of the derived solution. Our analysis suggests that a coated inclusion can be made neutral only to a remote isotropic phonon stress field; whereas it can be made harmonic to any remote uniform phonon stress field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it