MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W197505209

The use of integrated behavioral station in chronic behavioral studies

2008· article· en· W197505209 on OpenAlexaff
Boris Šakić

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWater mazeMorris water navigation taskPsychologyNeuroscienceOpen fieldBehavioral analysisDevelopmental psychologyMedicineCognitionPsychiatryHippocampus
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human and animal neurodegenerative diseases are often accompanied by constellations of neurologic and behavioral deficits. In a murine model of neuropsychiatric lupus we observe age-dependent deficits in food/water intake, spontaneous locomotor activity, motivated behavior, emotional reactivity, and learning/memory performance. Anecdotal observations include seizures and self-injurious behavior [1]. However, given relatively short observations in behavioral tasks, no information could be systematically collected with respect to resting, sleep, food/water intake, or epileptic episodes. These important measures can be confounding factors when assessing performance in activity-demanding tasks, such as open-field, plus-maze, water maze, and forced swim tests [2]. This incompleteness in assessing behavioral profile of lupus-prone mice led to a necessity for a

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling→French-language works237,207→