MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

HYDROCARBON‐INDUCED DIAGENETIC DOLOMITE AND PYRITE FORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE HORMOZ ISLAND SALT DOME, OFFSHORE IRAN

2010· article· en· W1975069295 on OpenAlex
Fereydoun Ghazban, Ihsan S. Al‐Aasm

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Geology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersUppsala UniversitetCore Research for Evolutional Science and TechnologyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAmerican Academy of Sleep Medicine
KeywordsGeologyDolomiteDiapirPyriteGeochemistryAnhydriteEvaporiteSedimentary rockDiagenesisMineralogyFluid inclusionsGypsumHydrothermal circulationPaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hormoz Island, a salt diapir in the eastern Persian Gulf, is dominated by the Infracambrian Hormoz Complex comprising both evaporites (Hormoz Salt) and carbonates, siliciclastics and volcanic rocks. Minerals include black, white and grey dolomites, pyrite, gypsum, anhydrite, apatite and iron oxides. Formation of some of the dolomite crystals is interpreted to be linked to the oxidation of hydrocarbons. The δ 13 C values of black dolomite crystals range from −0.8 to −2.07‰ VPDB, indicating that little if any of their carbon is derived from hydrocarbon oxidation but that sea water has provided carbon and Mg for dolomite precipitation. The δ 18 O values for these dolomites range from −9.2 to −15.3‰ VPDB, reflecting a temperature effect on isotopic fractionation. By contrast, δ 13 C values for white to grey dolomites range from −17.81 to −35.68‰ VPDB, indicating that the carbon may be derived from the oxidation of hydrocarbons. Based on the δ 18 O dolomite and temperatures obtained from fluid inclusion studies (215°C), the calculated δ 18 O water in equilibrium with these dolomites (+2 < δ 18 O fluid < +12‰) indicates the involvement of brines evolved via the interaction of seawater with the Hormoz Salt and associated sedimentary rocks. Some of the dolomite may have precipitated from post‐Cambrian seawaters at lower temperatures (ca.100 °C). Thus, the dolomites may have begun to form during deep burial but have also formed during salt diapirism at more shallow depths. Pyrite and native sulphur are interpreted to have formed in reducing conditions where the source of sulphur was H 2 S produced by the thermochemical reduction of sulphate in the Hormoz Salt evaporites. Heavy δ 34 S values for the anhydrites (ranging from 28.7 to 30.8‰) and for sulphides (ranging from 17.2 to 23.4‰) preclude a major contribution of sulphur from volcanic sources or from Early Cambrian shales. Pyrites, apatites and dolomites formed at depth within the diapir. It is envisaged that hydrocarbons leaked along the flanks of the Hormoz Island salt dome, resulting in reducing conditions which promoted the formation of diagenetic minerals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it