MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975086002 · doi:10.1016/j.ansens.2004.11.004

Lie theory and the Chern–Weil homomorphism

2005· article· fr· W1975086002 on OpenAlexaff
Anton Alekseev, Eckhard Meinrenken

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales Scientifiques de l École Normale Supérieure · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMathematics
TopicHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsChern–Weil homomorphismConnection (principal bundle)CohomologyHomomorphismPure mathematicsLie algebraAlgebra over a fieldCyclic homologyChern classGraded Lie algebraAlgebra homomorphismEquivariant cohomologyDe Rham cohomologyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let P → B be a principal G -bundle. For any connection θ on P , the Chern–Weil construction of characteristic classes defines an algebra homomorphism from the Weil algebra W g = S g ∗ ⊗ ∧ g ∗ into the algebra of differential forms A = Ω ( P ) . Invariant polynomials ( S g ∗ ) inv ⊂ W g map to cocycles, and the induced map in cohomology ( S g ∗ ) inv → H ( A basic ) is independent of the choice of θ . The algebra Ω ( P ) is an example of a commutative g -differential algebra with connection, as introduced by H. Cartan in 1950. As observed by Cartan, the Chern–Weil construction generalizes to all such algebras. In this paper, we introduce a canonical Chern–Weil map W g → A for possibly non-commutative g -differential algebras with connection. Our main observation is that the generalized Chern–Weil map is an algebra homomorphism “up to g -homotopy”. Hence, the induced map ( S g ∗ ) inv → H basic ( A ) is an algebra homomorphism. As in the standard Chern–Weil theory, this map is independent of the choice of connection. Applications of our results include: a conceptually easy proof of the Duflo theorem for quadratic Lie algebras, a short proof of a conjecture of Vogan on Dirac cohomology, generalized Harish-Chandra projections for quadratic Lie algebras, an extension of Rouvière's theorem for symmetric pairs, and a new construction of universal characteristic forms in the Bott–Shulman complex. Soit P → B un G -fibré principal. Pour toute connexion θ sur P la construction de classes caractéristiques de Chern–Weil définit un homomorphisme d'algèbres de l'algèbre de Weil W g = S g ∗ ⊗ ∧ g ∗ dans l'algèbre des formes différentielles A = Ω ( P ) . Les polynômes invariants ( S g ∗ ) inv ⊂ W g s'envoient dans l'espace des cocyles et l'application induite en cohomologie ( S g ∗ ) inv → H ( A basic ) est indépendante du choix de θ . L'algèbre Ω ( P ) est un exemple d'une algèbre g -différentielle commutative (définie par H. Cartan en 1950). Dans cet article nous définissons l'application canonique de Chern–Weil W g → A pour les algèbres g -différentielles qui possèdent une connexion et qui ne sont pas commutatives. Le résultat principal est que l'application de Chern–Weil généralisée est un homomorphisme d'algèbre à g -homotopie près. Alors, l'application induite ( S g ∗ ) inv → H basic ( A ) est un homomorphisme d'algèbres. Comme dans la théorie standard, cette application est indépendante du choix de la connexion. Parmi les applications de nos résultats on trouve : une démonstration facile de l'isomorphisme de Duflo pour les algèbres de Lie quadratiques, une démonstration courte de la conjecture de Vogan sur la cohomologie de Dirac, des projections de Harish-Chandra généralisées pour les algèbres de Lie quadratiques, une extension du théorème de Rouvière sur les paires symétriques, et une nouvelle construction des formes caractéristiques universelles dans le complexe de Bott–Shulman.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales Scientifiques de l École Normale SupérieureSame topicHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic TopologyFrench-language works237,207