Preferred Bonding Motif for Indium Aminoethanethiolate Complexes: Structural Characterization of (Me<sub>2</sub>NCH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>S)<sub>2</sub>InX/SR (X = Cl, I; R = 4-MeC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>, 4-MeOC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The metathesis reaction of InCl3 with Me2NCH2CH2SNa or the redox reaction of indium metal with elemental iodine and the disulfide (Me2NCH2CH2S)2 yield the indium bis(thiolate) complexes (Me2NCH2CH2S)2InX [X = Cl (3) and I (4)], respectively. Compounds 3 and 4 may be further reacted with the appropriate sodium thiolate salts to afford the heteroleptic tris(thiolate) complexes (Me2NCH2CH2S)2InSR [R = 4-MeC6H4 (5), 4-MeOC6H4 (6), and Pr (7)]. Reaction of 2,6-Me2C6H3SNa with 4 affords (Me2NCH2CH2S)2InS(2,6-Me2C6H3) (8), while no reaction is observed with 3, suggesting a greater reactivity for 4. All isolated compounds were characterized by elemental analysis, melting point, and Fourier transform IR and 1H and 13C{1H} NMR spectroscopies. X-ray crystallographic analyses of 3-6 show a bicyclic arrangement and a distorted trigonal-bipyramidal geometry for In in all cases. The two sulfur and one halogen (3 and 4) or three sulfur (5 and 6) atoms occupy equatorial positions, while the nitrogen atoms of the chelating (dimethylamino)ethanethiolate ligands occupy the axial positions. The metric parameters of the (Me2NCH2CH2S)2In framework were found to change minimally upon variation of the X/SR ligand, while the solubility of the corresponding compounds in organic solvents varied greatly. 1H NMR studies in D2O showed that 6 and 7 react slowly with an excess of the tripeptide l-glutathione and that the rate of reaction is affected by the pendant thiolate ligand -SR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it