MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975118237 · doi:10.1149/1.2098265

Studies of Aromatic Redox Shuttle Additives for LiFePO[sub 4]-Based Li-Ion Cells

2005· article· en· W1975118237 on OpenAlexaff
Claudia Buhrmester, Jun Chen, Lee Moshurchak, Junwei Jiang, J. R. Dahn

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverchargeRedoxChemistryMoleculeIonCombinatorial chemistryInorganic chemistryPhotochemistryOrganic chemistryBattery (electricity)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fifty eight aromatic organic molecules were screened as chemical shuttles to provide overcharge protection for /graphite and Li-ion cells. The majority of the molecules were based on methoxybenzene and on dimethoxybenzene with a variety of ligands added to explore their effect. The added ligands affect the redox potential of the molecules through their electron-withdrawing effect and affect the stability of the radical cation. Of all the molecules tested, only 2,5-di-tert-butyl-1,4-dimethoxybenzene shows an appropriate redox potential of vs and long-term stability during extended abusive overcharge totaling over of 100% overcharge per cycle. The reasons for the success of this molecule are explored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations125
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207