MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975136858 · doi:10.1167/2.7.428

Conscious visual abilities in a patient with early bilateral occipital damage

2010· article· en· W1975136858 on OpenAlexaff
Deborah Giaschi, Bruce Björnson, J. Jan, Muralidhar Tata, Sympascho Young, Christopher J. Lyons, William V. Good, Peter K. H. Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vision · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVisual perception and processing mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologySaccadic maskingBinocular visionMotion perceptionAudiologyVisual cortexVisual acuityOphthalmologyPerceptionNeuroscienceComputer visionMedicineEye movementComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MM is a young adult who experienced bilateral strokes at birth that resulted in loss of left Brodmann areas 17, 18, 19 and right area 17, with extensive damage to right area 18. In spite of the total absence of primary visual cortex, he plays video games and can ride a bicycle in traffic (Jan et al., 1986, Ped Neurol). This is a preliminary report on his preserved vision. Horizontal OKN could be elicited from either eye. Smooth pursuit showed saccadic intrusions. The color of red, green and blue targets could be named, but Farnsworth color discrimination performance was at chance. Binocular grating acuity using Teller acuity cards was 10 cpd, providing MM was allowed to move his head and eyes. This is within normal limits for a 3 year-old child. The direction of motion in 100% coherent random dot kinematograms could be identified with perfect accuracy at speeds above 2 deg/s. MM reported he could “see” the moving dots and was not guessing. At speeds below 2 deg/s, he could not perceive motion and showed no evidence of better than chance guessing. These abilities are different from those termed “blindsight” in patients with homonymous hemianopia because MM appears to be aware of the stimuli he can discriminate. His vision may be similar to the residual vision reported in patient GY (eg. Morland et al., 1999, Brain). MM's motion perception was further studied using functional MRI. Fast motion activated several cortical regions: anterior and posterior left superior temporal gyrus (BA 22, 38), right premotor cortex (BA 6), right precuneus (BA 31) and right posterior cingulate (BA 23). Although the right area V5/MT+ appeared to be present based on anatomic landmarks, no activation was observed in this region. No activation occurred with slow motion, stationary dots or full-field flashes of light. This case demonstrates remarkable plasticity in the human visual system and may have implications for understanding the functional organization of the motion pathways.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of VisionSame topicVisual perception and processing mechanismsFrench-language works237,207