Bibliographic record
Abstract
Borrowing heuristically from Freud's paper on psychoanalysis, and rhetoric's "locus of the irreparable," this essay develops an analysis of the HBO series Treme that treats the show as a project oriented toward the reconstruction of the symbolic order in the aftermath of disaster. If the show, on the one hand, invites us to take part in the collective working-through of suffering, on the other hand, like television generally, it remains lodged in the register of repetition. Le présent essai emprunte de manière heuristique l'article de Freud sur la psychanalyse et le « locus de l'irréparable » de la rhétorique, et élabore une analyse de la série Treme de HBO qui considère la démonstration comme un projet orienté vers la reconstruction de l'ordre symbolique postérieure à un désastre. Si la démonstration nous invite d'une part à participer à la perlaboration collective de la souffrance, elle demeure d'autre part, comme la télévision en général, logée dans le registre de la répétition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.037 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".