MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975147063 · doi:10.1088/0965-0393/8/6/307

An inverse approach for the prediction of the temperature evolution during induction heating of a semi-solid casting billet

2000· article· en· W1975147063 on OpenAlexaff
Ky Nguyen, A. Bendada

Bibliographic record

VenueModelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInduction Heating and Inverter Technology
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInduction heatingMaterials scienceAluminiumInduction hardeningMetallurgyInverseCastingMechanicsComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An inversion technique is developed to recover the temperature distribution along the radius of a cylindrical billet at the end of the induction heating phase in a semi-solid process using the surface temperature measurement. In the process, a metallic billet is first heated in an induction furnace until it reaches a semi-solid state (partially liquid and partially solid). Then, it is injected into a die and kept there until it solidifies. Subsequently, the die opens, the part is ejected and the cycle starts again. The temperature distribution within the billet at the end of the heating phase is of prime importance for the success of the process and the quality of the product. The inverse algorithm is applied to experimental data recorded by an infrared camera on the side of an aluminium billet heated in an IHS induction heating station. The temperature distribution in the billet is predicted for different heating power levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModelling and Simulation in Materials Science and EngineeringSame topicInduction Heating and Inverter TechnologyFrench-language works237,207