Evidence for the γ‐relaxation in the light scattering spectra of poly (<i>n</i>‐hexyl methacrylate) near the glass transition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The full range of relaxation processes present in optically pure poly‐(n‐hexyl methacrylate) (PHMA) was studied using Rayleigh–Brillouin and photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS). Brillouin shifts, linewidths, and Landau–Placzek ratios (LPR) were measured over the temperature range from −11 to 21 °C. The Brillouin splitting and linewidth were consistent with previous studies of PHMA, but the LPR was much lower, indicating that the scattered light primarily comes from intrinsic density fluctuations. Relaxation functions of the same PHMA sample were measured using PCS over the temperature range 0.5–52.5 °C. The average relaxation times calculated from a Williams–Watts fit follow a VFT temperature dependence, with the stretching parameter β decreasing with decreasing temperature. The distribution of relaxation times reveals a merging of the α and β‐relaxations over this temperature range, and the temperature dependent width confirms that there are at least two processes with separate temperature dependences. Furthermore, there appears a process at short times in the correlation function window at low temperatures. This upturn at the fastest relaxation times is attributed to the γ‐relaxation present in higher order methacrylate polymers. The effect of the γ‐relaxation is discussed in terms of the dynamic behavior over 12 decades in time. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 43: 1504–1519, 2005
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".