MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975162334 · doi:10.1029/2005pa001238

Glacial abrupt climate changes and Dansgaard‐Oeschger oscillations in a coupled climate model

2006· article· en· W1975162334 on OpenAlexaff
Zhaomin Wang, Lawrence A. Mysak

Bibliographic record

VenuePaleoceanography · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStadialGlacial periodGeologyClimatologyClimate statePaleoclimatologyClimate changeOceanographyGlobal warmingPaleontologyEffects of global warming

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are three fundamental features which characterize large glacial millennial (Dansgaard‐Oeschger) oscillations: (1) the climatic transitions were abrupt and large; (2) the lengths of both interstadials and stadials and the period of Dansgaard‐Oeschger oscillations were not uniform; and (3) there were no large millennial oscillations during an early stage of a glacial period and a peak glacial period. In this modeling study we offer a consistent explanation for these three features by employing an Earth system Model of Intermediate Complexity. We demonstrate that a moderate global cooling forces the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (MOC) into an unstable state and hence causes the flip‐flop of the Atlantic MOC between a strong mode and a weak mode. The durations of both interstadials and stadials associated with these millennial oscillations are modulated by the changing background climate in qualitative agreement with the observations. In a warm climate the Atlantic MOC is strong and stable, with the deep water formed mainly by intense heat loss to the atmosphere. In a cold climate the Atlantic MOC is weak and stable, and this mode is largely maintained by the process of sea ice brine rejection. Since the Dansgaard‐Oeschger oscillations result from an alternation between these two MOC states during an intermediate phase climate, we conclude that brine rejection plays a necessary role in the oscillations, confirming a hypothesis suggested in some proxy data studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaleoceanographySame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207