MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975196384 · doi:10.1080/10485251003605120

Generalised kernel smoothing for non-negative stationary ergodic processes

2010· article· en· W1975196384 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of nonparametric statistics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConcordia UniversityUniversité du Québec à Montréal
KeywordsMathematicsEstimatorSmoothingKernel smootherErgodic theoryApplied mathematicsAsymptotic distributionKernel (algebra)Consistency (knowledge bases)Kernel methodMathematical optimizationStatisticsMathematical analysisSupport vector machineCombinatoricsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we consider a generalised kernel smoothing estimator of the regression function with non-negative support, using gamma probability densities as kernels, which are non-negative and have naturally varying shapes. It is based on a generalisation of Hille's lemma and a perturbation idea that allows us to deal with the problem at the boundary. Its uniform consistency and asymptotic normality are obtained at interior and boundary points, under a stationary ergodic process assumption, without using traditional mixing conditions. The asymptotic mean squared error of the estimator is derived and the optimal value of smoothing parameter is also discussed. Graphical illustrations of the proposed estimator are provided for simulated as well as for real data. A simulation study is also carried out to compare our method with the competing local linear method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.730
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it