Raman Study of the Hexafluoroaluminate Ion in Solid and Molten FLINAK
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Raman spectra have been obtained for matrix-isolated AlF6(3-) in an LiF/NaF/KF (FLINAK) eutectic mixture. Three Raman bands characteristic of the hexafluoroaluminate ion were identified in the solids formed from FLINAK melts which contained small amounts (5-11 mol%) of either AlF3 or Na3AlF6. The three allowed Raman-active bands of the matrix-isolated octahedral complex ion, nu 1(A1g), nu 2(Eg), and nu 5(F2g), were observed at 560.5, 380, and 325 cm-1, respectively, for the solid sample at 25 degrees C. Wavenumbers and relative intensities were similar to those of Na3AlF6 (cryolite), K3AlF6, and K2NaAlF6 (elpasolite) and other crystals known to contain discrete, octahedral AlF6(3-) ions. Peak positions, half-widths, and relative intensities for the bands were measured for samples at temperatures different from room temperature through the melting transition and into the molten state. The transition from high-temperature solid to molten salt at about 455 degrees C occurred gradually without perceptible change in the peak positions, half-widths, or relative intensities. For a sample in molten FLINAK at 455 degrees C, the nu 1(A1g), nu 2(Eg), and nu 5(F2g) modes of the AlF6(3-) ion were observed at 542, 365, and 324 cm-1, respectively. Raman depolarization experiments were consistent with these assignments, and the low value of the depolarization ratio of the nu 1(A1g) mode at 542 cm-1 indicated that the sample was molten above 455 degrees C. Differential thermal analysis also indicated that the FLINAK samples melted at about 455 degrees C. Raman measurements were performed for samples at temperatures from 25 to 600 degrees C in a silver dish, on a hot stage, in an argon-filled atmosphere, under a microscope. Additional Raman experiments were performed on samples at temperatures from 25 to 750 degrees C in a conventional graphite windowless cell, in an argon-filled quartz tube, in a standard furnace. Over the concentration range 4.8-11 mol% AlF3 (CR 23-8.0) in FLINAK, only bands due to the AlF6(3-) ion were detected. There was no evidence to support the presence of other aluminum complexes in these melts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".